|
What about the person in the desert / on the deathbed / hanging from a
cliff?
Jacob Gwin
We received the following question through the Bible
Forum website:
If baptism is required for salvation, as you teach, what about the
person who wants to be saved in the desert, or on their death bed? Does this
mean that they can’t be saved because they are unable to be baptized?
Answer: This question has many forms and is
presented to challenge the idea that one must be baptized in order to be saved.
The reasoning goes that if it can be shown that baptism is impossible for some
then it must not be required for any. This logic is flawed and directly
contradicts the scriptures.
The scriptures are very clear about the necessity of baptism for
salvation. Here are a few passages that teach the necessity of baptism very
clearly:
| I Peter 3:21 |
The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now
save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a
good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: |
| Acts 2:38 |
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized
every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye
shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. |
| Mark 16:15-16 |
And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the
gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but
he that believeth not shall be damned.
|
To argue that one doesn’t need to be baptized requires that one
argue against these clear verses that say that baptism “doth also now save us”
and is “for the remission of sins.” These verses are very clear. Baptism is
required for salvation.
The question presents a hypothetical situation in an effort to
prove that baptism is not required for salvation. In the situations were
baptism is absolutely impossible, we must leave the judgment to God. The only
revelation that we have in the Bible is that baptism is required for salvation.
Arguing based upon hypothetical situations is dangerous and care
should be used when making such arguments. For example, we could use the same
hypothetical presented above in an effort to show that faith is not required in
order to be saved. The hypothetical situation would go something like this: “If
a person has to have faith to go to heaven…what happens to a person
that wants to be saved on their death bed but has never heard the gospel of
Christ?” Does this hypothetical prove that faith is not required for salvation?
Obviously not because we are told that we must have faith in order to be
pleasing to God (Hebrews 11:6) and that this faith comes by hearing the gospel
(Romans 10:17). So, then, what happens to the person in this hypothetical
situation? Again, we’ll have to leave judgment of this person to God. This
hypothetical situation does not prove that faith is not required for salvation
just as the hypothetical situation presented initially does not prove that
baptism is not required for salvation.
Baptism is clearly required for salvation. Arguing otherwise is
arguing against the clear teachings of the scriptures.
|